IBIS Macromodel Task Group Meeting date: 19 August 2008 Members (asterisk for those attending): Ambrish Varma, Cadence Design Systems Anders Ekholm, Ericsson * Arpad Muranyi, Mentor Graphics Corp. Barry Katz, SiSoft * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Brad Brim, Sigrity Brad Griffin, Cadence Design Systems David Banas, Xilinx Donald Telian, consultant Doug White, Cisco Systems Essaid Bensoudane, ST Microelectronics Fangyi Rao, Agilent Ganesh Narayanaswamy, ST Micro Gang Kang, Sigrity Hemant Shah, Cadence Design Systems Ian Dodd, Agilent Joe Abler, IBM * John Angulo, Mentor Graphics John Shields, Mentor Graphics Ken Willis, Cadence Design Systems Kumar Lance Wang, Cadence Design Systems Luis Boluna, Cisco Systems * Michael Mirmak, Intel Corp. Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Steinberger, SiSoft Mustansir Fanaswalla, Xilinx Patrick O'Halloran, Tiburon Design Automation Paul Fernando, NCSU * Pavani Jella, TI Radek Biernacki, Agilent (EESof) Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Ray Comeau, Cadence Design Systems Richard Mellitz, Intel Richard Ward, Texas Instruments Sam Chitwood, Sigrity Sanjeev Gupta, Agilent Shangli Wu, Cadence Design Systems Sid Singh, Extreme Networks Stephen Scearce, Cisco Systems Steve Pytel, Ansoft Syed Huq, Cisco Systems Syed Sadeghi, ST Micro Terry Jernberg, Cadence Design Systems * Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Vikas Gupta, Xilinx Vuk Borich, Agilent * Walter Katz, SiSoft Zhen Mu, Cadence Design Systems --------------------------------------------------------------------- Opens: ====== Walter: The whole purpose of EMD was to remove all internal circuit information from this file and put it into subcircuit (bristles only). Bob: What is the definition of a "bristle"? Walter: Any connection point to which external connections are made. May include package, connector, oscilloscope probe, etc... Separate question is where exactly that point is for through hole vias. Todd: The term is overloaded, let's not use three different terms (port, terminal, bristle) pick one term for clarity. Several participants favored "terminal". Discussion on extended net, electrical net, cad net Arpad: Let's talk about the fundamental question in the open Mike M.: We have had genereralized netlisting formats, now we are talking about "extended net" format specific to post layout Duality between pre layout vs. post layout database Walter: EMD is manufacturing related, for module design to represent something that is physically manufactured Todd: It is not limited to that, is it? Walter: It is not. -------------------------- Call for patent disclosure: - No one declared a patent. ------------- Review of ARs: Todd and Michael M: Contact Synopsys about HSPICE legal issues - A draft is almost ready to be sent to Synopsys, will be finalized and sent today. Arpad: Post last weeks material to IBIS-ATM's web site - done on 8/15/2008 Prepare an IBIS-EBD improvement list - in progress Old ARs: - David Banas: Report Xilinx position on LTI assumption for SerDes - no update - Arpad: Write parameter passing syntax proposal (BIRD draft) for *-AMS models in IBIS that is consistent with the parameter passing syntax of the AMI models - not done - TBD: Propose a parameter passing syntax for the SPICE [External ...] also? - Arpad: Review the documentation (annotation) in the macro libraries. - deferred until a demand arises or we have nothing else to do ------------- New Discussion: Arpad proceded with explaining the proposal that was posted to the IBIS-ATM web site on 8/15/2008. Walter considers the proposal unnecessarily complicated and doesn't agree with having any netlisting capability in the EMD specification. Arpad feels that removing the netlisting to the subcircuits only defers the problem that will have to be solved sooner or later. Walter disagrees, becuase he feels that the HSPICE subset language would solve anyone's netlisting needs. The discussion kept returning to the original "fundamental question" brought up in the opens by Walter: what do we want to cover in this specification. Walter suggested that he would discuss his "original" proposal from April so we would all be on the same page again. Now that it has been introduced, Arpad suggested that people look at his proposal in more detail and provide feedback on it on the reflector or in next week's meeting. Next meeting: 26 August 2008 12:00pm PT -----------